Great Startup Tools

Best 5 Podcast Editing Softwares in 2026: Compare Top Tools

By Great Startup Tools

Built a tool worth recommending?

Introduction

The right podcast editing software depends on how you record and edit. This roundup compares five options for different budgets and workflows, from hands-on audio control to transcript-based editing and automatic cleanup.

Quick comparison

ToolBest forPlatformPricing
DescriptEditing podcasts by editing a transcriptDesktop, web; audio and video editorFreemium
AudacityFree, hands-on audio editingDesktop: Windows, macOS, Linux; audio editorFree
Adobe AuditionDetailed audio production and restorationDesktop; audio editorFree trial
RiversideRecording and editing remote podcasts and videoWeb; audio and video platformFreemium
Cleanvoice AIAutomating routine spoken-audio cleanupWeb, API; automated cleanupPaid

For direct control over audio, consider Audacity or Audition. Riverside combines remote recording and editing, while Descript lets you edit audio and video through a transcript. Cleanvoice AI handles common cleanup tasks, but it isn’t a replacement for a full audio workstation.

1. Descript

Best for: Transcript-based editing across audio and video.

With Descript, you can edit a spoken recording by editing its transcript. Removing a section or tightening an interview can feel more straightforward this way than working on an audio timeline, especially if you’re more comfortable with text.

Descript also has multitrack tools and podcast production features, so you can do more than cut from a transcript. Its main distinction is that you can edit both audio and video this way. If you need specialist mixing or restoration tools, you may still prefer a dedicated audio workstation.

2. Audacity

Best for: Free, hands-on audio editing.

Audacity is free, open-source desktop software for recording and editing audio on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can handle podcast production without a subscription, making it a practical starting point for solo hosts and budget-conscious teams.

You work directly with the audio rather than editing a transcript. That gives you hands-on control, though newcomers may need time to get used to a traditional audio editor. Audacity’s main draw is free access to podcast recording and editing tools across major desktop platforms.

3. Adobe Audition

Best for: Detailed audio production and restoration.

Adobe Audition is a professional audio workstation for recording, editing, mixing, and repairing sound. Its podcast tools suit editors who want more control over audio than a lightweight tool may offer.

You can shape a production from individual tracks through to the finished mix, with tools for restoration as well as editing. That range helps when a recording needs more than basic cuts and cleanup. Audition stands out for its restoration and mixing tools.

4. Riverside

Best for: Recording and editing remote podcast and video content.

Riverside combines recording and editing in a web-based platform, including text-based editing. It’s a good fit for teams that record remote guests and want to continue editing in the same place.

Recording and then making transcript-based edits without switching tools can make the process simpler. Riverside’s main draw is having remote recording and text-based editing together. Its video features may appeal to video podcasters, but the platform won’t suit every audio-only production or editors who prefer a dedicated audio workstation.

5. Cleanvoice AI

Best for: Automating common spoken-audio cleanup.

Cleanvoice AI focuses on cleaning spoken recordings. It can remove filler words, stutters, mouth sounds, long silences, and noise, so you can handle routine fixes without making each edit by hand.

You can use the service on the web or through an API, which gives you options for individual workflows and other applications. Its main feature is automated removal of several distracting speech sounds in one cleanup-focused tool. Cleanvoice AI isn’t a full manual audio workstation, so think of it as a cleanup tool rather than an all-purpose editor.

How we picked these tools

These five options cover different podcast editing workflows, rather than serving as interchangeable editors. We considered recording, hands-on editing, transcript-based controls, audio restoration, and automated cleanup, as well as platform availability.

We also looked at whether each tool supports manual editing, automated work, or both. A free desktop editor, a professional workstation, and a web-based recording platform each solve different problems. The right choice depends on how you record and the kind of editing you need.

Frequently asked questions

Can free software handle podcast editing?

Yes. Audacity is free, open-source software for recording and editing podcasts on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can be enough for hands-on editing, though it uses a traditional audio workflow that may take some time to learn.

When is transcript-based editing useful?

It’s useful when you want to cut spoken content by working with words instead of finding each edit on an audio timeline. A traditional timeline gives you direct control over tracks and sound, which can work better for detailed mixing and repair.

Should I choose a full editor or automated cleanup?

A full audio editor gives you manual control over recording, cuts, mixing, and repair. A cleanup-focused tool like Cleanvoice AI automates common fixes, such as removing filler words or silences, but doesn’t replace a full workstation. For remote recording or video podcasts, check that the platform supports your recording setup and editing needs before choosing a workflow.

The verdict

Each tool fits a different workflow. Descript combines transcript-based editing with audio and video support, while Audacity is a capable free option for hands-on work. Adobe Audition suits editors who want deeper audio control. Choose based on how you record and how much control you want over the editing process.

Related reviews